On Wed, 03 Nov 2010 17:48:57 +0100 Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 11/03/2010 05:29 PM, Mike Blumenkrantz wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I've been valgrinding some of my gnutls-using apps and have found what > > appears to be a small leak in the handshaking code (using 2.10.2). > > ecore_con_ssl.c can be found here: > > https://svn.enlightenment.org/svn/e/trunk/ecore/src/lib/ecore_con/ecore_con_ssl.c > > > > ==19053== 1,024 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 146 of > > 160 ==19053== at 0x4027A66: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:236) > > ==19053== by 0x40B77D4: _gnutls_send_client_hello > > (gnutls_handshake.c:1985) ==19053== by 0x40B8253: _gnutls_send_hello > > (gnutls_handshake.c:2299) ==19053== by 0x40B9037: > > _gnutls_handshake_client (gnutls_handshake.c:2775) ==19053== by > > 0x40B8F0D: gnutls_handshake (gnutls_handshake.c:2699) ==19053== by > > 0x4055063: _ecore_con_ssl_server_init_gnutls (ecore_con_ssl.c:515) > > > > > > This leak occurs client side every single time I handshake. > > Thanks it seems it was introduced with 2.10 and eliminated again in > 2.11. Anyway, does the following patch solve the issue for you? > > http://git.savannah.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=gnutls.git;a=commitdiff;h=f48cb4e387e0b89627310499ce5d80b3063a5ee2 > > regards, > Nikos It does indeed fix the leak. -- Mike Blumenkrantz Zentific: Our boolean values are huge. _______________________________________________ Help-gnutls mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-gnutls
