On Thursday 09 June 2011 08:46:20 Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos wrote: > We thought about that, but it wouldn't be adequate. That is because gmp > that now gnutls is linked to, is LGPLv3. Even if we allow dual > license gmp doesn't. Note however that the problem is not in LGPLv3 > which allows linking with everything, even proprietary programs. It is > GPLv2-only that causes the issue. It can be easily solved by the > authors of GPLv2-only programs by allowing linking with an > LGPLv3 library (see [0]). Unfortunately the poppler code is based on xpdf code, for which the original author does not appear willing to relicense. The poppler additions are GPLv2+.
Is there any scope for asking gmp to do GPLv2/LGPLv3+? Is that the only issue? Brad _______________________________________________ Help-gnutls mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-gnutls
