On Thu, 15 Mar 2012 19:05:40 +0100 Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos <[email protected]> wrote:
NM> On 03/15/2012 04:19 PM, Sven Geggus wrote: >> So I definitely think gnutls should be more tolerant about >> certificates which are not in use but provided anyway. NM> I don't think this is a good idea. The protocol exactly specifies which NM> certificates should be present. It does not allow any kind of additional NM> information to be present so by providing it you violate the protocol. NM> On the practical side, a simpler parser allows for simpler code and NM> thus less bugs. Could the error message be improved, if that doesn't complicate the code too much? Ted _______________________________________________ Help-gnutls mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-gnutls
