On 08/19/2012 06:23 AM, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote: > I suppose I'm comparing this to the openssl method where there's a > per-thread queue of error codes which can then be translated to > strings. You might get 0 or 1 back from RSA_verify(), for example, > but if you want detail you have to go into the per-thread error stack, > extract codes, and translate them to strings. > > It may be the case that the GNUTLS equivalent functions are more > descriptive. If that's the case, then I probably don't need this > capability after all.
Indeed. There is nothing like an errno style of error codes in gnutls. Each function returns a proper error code. regards, Nikos _______________________________________________ Help-gnutls mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-gnutls
