Sharshera wrote: > I have a c++ code that I can compile successfully on g++ 2.96 while I > can't under 3.4.1 and 3.0?
Firstly: http://gcc-2.96.html Secondly: show some code, I rather tend to share reds floyd's opinion. > Are these two known to have issues with STL? The issue is called porting from pre- or non-standard C++ to standard C++. > I know this is a very general question but I am just wondering if STL > is better supported in some version while not in the others. Indeed, it is too general. Just for your info also: the STL is dead and has been unmaintained during the last years. What is alive is the C++ standardlibrary, which has been strongly influenced by the STL but still is not the same. Uli -- http://gcc.gnu.org/faq.html http://parashift.com/c++-faq-lite/ _______________________________________________ Help-gplusplus mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-gplusplus
