Alan Woodland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > This code segfaults on the last line quoted here, which isn't surprising > because c isn't aligned correctly. My question now is twofold: > a) Why isn't c aligned how __m128 needs to be? and
Because "operator new[]" has been compiled with "strictest alignment 8 on this platform", which is true for all "regular" types, but not for SSE :( > b) How to work around it? Is it even possible to get an array of __m128s > aligned correctly? Use memalign() or posix_memalign(). Cheers, -- In order to understand recursion you must first understand recursion. Remove /-nsp/ for email. _______________________________________________ help-gplusplus mailing list help-gplusplus@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-gplusplus
