> > Probably not. You'll have to either: > > Getting C++ code to be *binary* comparible across major revisions is > generally not possible. >
Not true in all cases. I am doing exactly that. But in order to make it work my library does not export C++ symbols. Only C symbols are allowed and everything should from "user of library" point of view look like a C library. Then it is possible to re-link libstdc++.a and libgcc_eh.a into your library at the expense of greater filesize. Look for something like "relinking libstdc++.a" by me and Paul Pluzhnikov for instance on google groups. I've written quite a few questions on the topic and Paul Pluzhnikov has answered them almost all the time. -- Henrik _______________________________________________ help-gplusplus mailing list help-gplusplus@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-gplusplus
