> Furthermore, according to the ISO standard C++ (ยง13.4 - Address of an > overloaded function): > > "A use of an overloaded function name without arguments is resolved in > certain contexts to a function, a pointer to function or a pointer to > member function for a specific function from the overload set. A func- > tion template name is considered to name a set of overloaded functions > in such contexts. The function selected is the one whose type matches > the target type required in the context. The target can be [...] an > explicit type conversion." yes i understand the same as you here. there seems to be a difference between the standard and the implementations...
Armel _______________________________________________ help-gplusplus mailing list help-gplusplus@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-gplusplus
