Paul Pluzhnikov a écrit : > You have a bug, and valgrind will likely show it to you immediately, > so why don't you stop wasting time hypothesisizing what the problem > might be, and use proper tools to find it.
Valgring said: ==16807== LEAK SUMMARY: ==16807== definitely lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks. ==16807== possibly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks. ==16807== still reachable: 35182 bytes in 15 blocks. ==16807== suppressed: 0 bytes in 0 blocks. Segmentation fault Do I have to understand that there is no problem? And before ==16807== Use of uninitialised value of size 4 ==16807== at 0x8049217: main (in /home/lch/SRC/TCOV/ECXX/ecxx) ==16807== ==16807== Process terminating with default action of signal 11 (SIGSEGV) ==16807== Bad permissions for mapped region at address 0x804A8BA ==16807== at 0x8049217: main (in /home/lch/SRC/TCOV/ECXX/ecxx) ==16807== ==16807== ERROR SUMMARY: 41 errors from 19 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0) ==16807== malloc/free: in use at exit: 35182 bytes in 15 blocks. ==16807== malloc/free: 60 allocs, 45 frees, 39789 bytes allocated. ==16807== For counts of detected errors, rerun with: -v ==16807== searching for pointers to 15 not-freed blocks. ==16807== checked 1276260 bytes. And finally I have no idea where the fault can be. The fact is that if I use myclass instance(param, ...), I don't have the problem. If I use myclass *instance = new myclass(param, ...), I have the problem. Maybe because I link a .o that I have created. _______________________________________________ help-gplusplus mailing list help-gplusplus@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-gplusplus
