Hello,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I am using gcc version 3.4.2 (mingw-special) version compiler and the
> following code is not giving expected output.
>
#include <iostream>
using namespace std;
int main() { double d; cin >> d; cout << d; return 0; }
>
> It gives out a garbage value int output when I give 2.22507e-308 as
> input value to read.
As others have said, this seems to be an overflow. Try do increase the
exponent to find the minimal one producing sensible results.
If a value near to 1e-38 seems to be the smallest sensible value, then
internally something is converted to or from float (single precision)
this would not be a bug, I think the only requirement for double is to
be at least as accurate as float. But the machines, where mingw runs
on, usually support double, so it would be a problem.
Try
double d = 1.0
for (int i = 0; i < 400; i++)
std::cout<< d/=10.0;
On my system 2.22507e-308 is no problem with your app, values down to
2.22507e-323 produce sensible results, but with decreasing accuracy,
and 2.22507e-324 produces zero. All inputs down from there produce
garbage, i.e. underruns. Probably my system supports denormalized
presentations of double, i.e. smaller values than the minimal one with
full precision, which is 2.22507e-308. This explains the 15 digits
extra, which are the number of digits the mantissa can hold on my
system.
Look at std::numerical_limits<double>::min() etc.
Bernd Strieder
_______________________________________________
help-gplusplus mailing list
help-gplusplus@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-gplusplus
