At 4 Sep 2006 00:19:35 -0700 "Maxim Yegorushkin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Rolf Magnus wrote: > > [] > > > But linking is another story. When linking the result generated from C++ > > code, you need different linker options than for C code, and the linker > > can't find out the language that the object code was compiled from, so you > > have to tell it explicitly. When you use gcc for linking, it will pass the > > options relevant for C code to the linker (unless you explicitly specify > > the language), while g++ will link it as C++ code. > > Does the linker care about the language object files were generated > from? From what I gather from info ld the only c++-specific option > which may affect the (binary) output of ld is -Ur. Am I missing > something? g++ adds -lstdc++ (at least) to the link -- that is, c++ has additional run time libs over plain C. > > > -- Robert Heller -- 978-544-6933 Deepwoods Software -- Linux Installation and Administration http://www.deepsoft.com/ -- Web Hosting, with CGI and Database [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Contract Programming: C/C++, Tcl/Tk _______________________________________________ help-gplusplus mailing list help-gplusplus@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-gplusplus
