Bernd Strieder wrote: > > I think I would prefer the warning in your case, if there are no other > reasons for the template hackery, then it should not be done. If you > have the same problem in more instances, then creating a custom traits > class might be helpful, i.e. make general_version to a class and put > the things depending on the integer type into it as typedefs or > whatever, just extending the idea. Maybe you could use existing traits > classes, like those from boost, I think they include signedness. >
What I did is I implemented template fn bool isnegative() which is used instead of <0. This fn returns false in general and is specialized for signed types so that it returns <0. > I'm probably not reachable until next year, so I have to hope there are > competent people to help you still reading, if you have more questions. Happy new year ;) m _______________________________________________ help-gplusplus mailing list help-gplusplus@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-gplusplus
