Christian Christmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Fri, 19 Jan 2007 09:18:56 -0800, Paul Pluzhnikov wrote: > >> You really ought to read this: >> http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html > > I don't think so. "Smart" people can answer your question from > my first posting. Sorry, if you didn't understand them.
I did understand your question perfectly well. That doesn't make your question smart, and insisting that it is doesn't make you look too good either :-( I've now looked up the original post by Giorgos Keramidas: http://groups.google.com/group/comp.unix.programmer/msg/6bd69c3b64f0584c from which you were quoting. The answer is: there is no way that source produced claimed output -- the source was (obviously) trimmed. Here is the line that was trimmed from it: cout << "l=" << (void*)l << ", pch=" << (void*)pch << endl; Cheers, -- In order to understand recursion you must first understand recursion. Remove /-nsp/ for email. _______________________________________________ help-gplusplus mailing list help-gplusplus@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-gplusplus
