Paul Pluzhnikov wrote:
fangee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
A. Because doing so makes the conversation harder to read.
Q. Why should I not top-post?
Please do not top-post.
Following yuor suggestion I gave up statically compiling and I found a
better (I think) solution: pass to the linker the option -Wl,-rpath.
You never explained what problem static linking was intended
to solve. Without knowing your goal, it is impossible to tell whether
'-rpath' is a correct solution, and whether better solutions exist.
Cheers,
Sorry for top-posting.
Here's my goal:
years ago I developed an application which I must compile with g++ 2.95.
As I can recall, I was able to static compiling it and having it run on
linux systems where no g++ nor libstdc++ were installed.
Recently I discovered that I lost the executable and so I wanted to
recompile it. As it seems I cannot static compile it again, but linking
with '-rpath .' I only have to put libstdc++ in the same directory where
the executable (dinamycally compiled) is.
Regards,
f.
_______________________________________________
help-gplusplus mailing list
help-gplusplus@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-gplusplus
