mathieu wrote: > Hello, > > I am looking for a flag that would warn me about someting like this > (*). I have tried so far:
I don't think that there is a warning, because AFAIK wrap around is the only option for chip and compiler makers not killing performance in the known safe cases. I'm not fully sure, but I think that there has been some recent discussion about even mandating wrap-around. The right thing to do would be correcting the source code > if ( index <= s - 1 ) if (index < s) avoiding all problems, and following the C++ iterator range idiom. s==0 means never true, instead of always true as before. All occurences of <= in index or iterator comparisions are suspicious. Bernd Strieder _______________________________________________ help-gplusplus mailing list help-gplusplus@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-gplusplus
