Pedro, Thank you for your response. I was told by a person at Code Soucery that the ABI specification is the same but there are differences specifically with name mangling and templates. It sounds like what you are telling me is that GCC developers will most likelt not change the ABI between such minor revisions.
Thanks again, Steve -------------- Original message ---------------------- From: "Pedro Lamarão" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > On 14 abr, 22:56, Paul Pluzhnikov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Stephen Banville) writes: > > > 'm looking to find out if there are any ABI differences between the > > > VxWorks 3.3 and 3.3.2 tool chains regarding C++isms. > > > > No idea about these specific tool chains, but it is my understanding > > that GCC developers strive *not* to change ABI between patchlevels. > > IOW, there should be no ABI differences between 3.3 and 3.3.2. > > > > Cheers, > > -- > > In order to understand recursion you must first understand recursion. > > Remove /-nsp/ for email. > > IIRC, there was an ABI change from 3.1 to 3.2, and that was the last C+ > + ABI change. > > -- > Pedro Lamarão > > _______________________________________________ > help-gplusplus mailing list > help-gplusplus@gnu.org > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-gplusplus _______________________________________________ help-gplusplus mailing list help-gplusplus@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-gplusplus
