Scott Meyers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The class is abstract and has no meaningful virtual function > implementations. There is no reason for this class to have a vtbl nor > for its (implicit) constructors or its destructor to adjust the vptr,
Isn't the rtti info referred to via the vtbl? -Miles -- Any man who is a triangle, has thee right, when in Cartesian Space, to have angles, which when summed, come to know more, nor no less, than nine score degrees, should he so wish. [TEMPLE OV THEE LEMUR] _______________________________________________ help-gplusplus mailing list help-gplusplus@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-gplusplus
