At Thu, 24 May 2007 11:09:10 -0700 Paul Pluzhnikov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Robert Heller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > gcc can link C++ code, but you need to give it a 'hint' that you are in > > fact linking C++ code, usually by including the -l option(s) that g++ > > would normally add: > > > > gcc -g -o test test.o Product.o DerivedProduct.o Creator.o \ > > DerivedCreator.o -lstdc++ -lc++ > > This (IMHO) is a very bad advice(TM). Very true. My point is that g++ adds some additional options to the link step that are specific to C++ -- one should *always* use g++ to link C++ code (compiled by g++). > > The link line above is incorrect for all versions of gcc I am > aware of. Yeah, probably it is. It is NOT something I have done in recent times. > > Correct link line may (and does) change with different versions of > g++, so *never* do this. Always use 'g++' to link C++ code. > > Cheers, -- Robert Heller -- 978-544-6933 Deepwoods Software -- Linux Installation and Administration http://www.deepsoft.com/ -- Web Hosting, with CGI and Database [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Contract Programming: C/C++, Tcl/Tk _______________________________________________ help-gplusplus mailing list help-gplusplus@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-gplusplus
