On Jun 20, 4:16 pm, Bernd Strieder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello, > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Yes, what you suggest will work, but is impractical when you have an > > amount or code that takes hours to compile you need to fix... :/ > > I'm looking for a solution along the lines of adding a flag, or using > > a different preprocessor maybe... > > Do you know anything like that? > > No, sorry. Perhaps you could create a header file containing only a > comment, and prepend #include "new_header.h" to all files in the > project, should not be too hard with a script. Perhaps you can even > copy that file to all directories to avoid -I problems. > > Perhaps you can tell what you really want. This seems pretty strange to > me. > > Bernd Strieder
Hi Bernd, What I need is to build (script wise) a reliable inclusion tree. I already have the code (py) to do that, but that relies on the preprocessor's output, so the result ends up partial. While exploring this issue, I realized that the problem is this optimization, and now I'm wondering if I can work around it without changing the source files. Thanks again for your help! :) - Tali _______________________________________________ help-gplusplus mailing list help-gplusplus@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-gplusplus
