In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Paul Pluzhnikov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> AlfC <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> Is there any way to tell g++ to link to specific libraries from
>> within the source code,
>
> No.
>
> Why do you think it's a good idea to be able to do this?
>
> Cheers,
I agree, it should be the responsibility of the IDE to do such things.
IMHO Ultimate++ (upp.sf.net) is much better fit for "skript-like" c++
coding: it provides a boost-alike lib, and the concept of modularized
compilation: each project is composed of multiple packages, and each
package does store such things as lib-requirements and compiler-flags.
so, in order to use AlfC's code one only needs to select it from a
list of packages, and the linking is taken care of by the IDE. installation
of missing libraries isn't implemented there though, but at least it's
cross-plattform that way...
btw, I appologize for my enthusiasm, I'm not responsible for Ultimate++
though. therefore: what do other c++ programmers think of this project?
--
Better send the eMails to netscape.net, as to
evade useless burthening of my provider's /dev/null...
P
_______________________________________________
help-gplusplus mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-gplusplus
