On Oct 18, 12:07 pm, Pedro Lamarão <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Oct 18, 2:58 pm, Jeff Schwab <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Is the following error message correct? It seems like system() ought
> > to be in the ::std namespace. What am I missing?
>
> > // main.cc
> > #include <cstdlib>
> > namespace system { }
>
> > $ g++ -ansi -pedantic -Wall -c main.cc
> > main.cc:3: error: 'namespace system { }' redeclared as different
> > kind of symbol
> > /usr/include/stdlib.h:738: error: previous declaration of 'int
> > system(const char*)'
> > make: *** [main.o] Error 1
>
> > My current work-around is an unnamed "wrapper" namespace:
>
> > namespace { namespace system { } }
>
> This behaviour is alloweb by the Standard.
>
> In the section [headers] paragraph 4 of the current draft we read:
>
> "Except as noted in clauses 18 through 27 and Annex D the contents of
> each header cname shall be the same as that of
> the corresponding header name.h, as specified in the Standard C99
> Library (1.2) or the C Unicode TR, as appropriate, as
> if by inclusion. In the C++ Standard Library, however, the
> declarations (except for names which are defined as macros
> in C) are within namespace scope (3.3.5) of the namespace std. It is
> unspecified whether these names are first declared
> within the global namespace scope and are then injected into namespace
> std by explicit using-declaration s (7.3.3)."
>
> That last sentence means the compiler is allowed to declare these
> names in the global namespace.
>
> I don't have the current Standard around to check if the same language
> is in place, but I believe it to be so.
Thank you. I had no idea this was allowed.
Any suggestions for work-arounds better than wrapping my own header
contents in an unnamed namespace are welcome.
_______________________________________________
help-gplusplus mailing list
help-gplusplus@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-gplusplus
