Does anyone know of portability issues regarding the implicit copy constructor?
I'm porting some code written for WIndows & Linux into an embedded system. I have found that my stack gets corrupted (in the embedded system) unless I create copy constructors for a few classes. It seems that on Linux this is not required since the original code relied on the implicit copy constructor. What complicates this a bit is that the objects in question have objects in them based on templates. Since all the objects in question have operator= defined, writing the copy constructor was easy... but I'm still not sure I solved the memory corruption issue or just moved it so things just appear to work. The compilers used are very different... I don't have the versions handy but 1 is g++ on red hat while the other is a g++ cross compiler for PPC. Anyone have some advice? _______________________________________________ help-gplusplus mailing list help-gplusplus@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-gplusplus
