It is reporting grub 1.99 on the grub boot menu. Did a grub2-install /dev/sda and it went thru with no errors, but still shows 1.99?
Used a bootinfoscript from sourceforge that makes a complete report on the boot setup. On 5 Sep 2014 at 15:55, Jordan Uggla wrote: From: Jordan Uggla <[email protected]> Date sent: Fri, 5 Sep 2014 15:55:55 -0700 Subject: Re: Problem after update with grub and --unrestricted on i386 To: "Michael D. Setzer II" <[email protected]> Copies to: help-grub <[email protected]> > On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 3:06 PM, Michael D. Setzer II > <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 5 Sep 2014 at 14:58, Jordan Uggla wrote: > > > > From: Jordan Uggla <[email protected]> > > Date sent: Fri, 5 Sep 2014 14:58:23 -0700 > > Subject: Re: Problem after update with grub and > > --unrestricted on i386 To: "Michael D. Setzer > > II" <[email protected]> Copies to: help-grub > > <[email protected]> > > > >> On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 11:04 PM, Michael D. Setzer II > >> <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > I just rebooted the machine again, and problem is that it doesn't > >> > show what the file is: just get the message > >> > > >> > error: file not found > >> > error: file not found > >> > error: file not found > >> > > >> > Press any key to continue > >> > > >> > It does then continue after waiting a short time, so one doesn't > >> > have to press any key. > >> > > >> > > >> > I did just find the the grub had some insmod with efi and ieee > >> > which where not in the /boot/grub2 directory, so commented them > >> > out, and that elimanated the file not found messages. > >> > > >> > But still not sure about the --unrestricted issue. > >> > > >> > Another issue might be that the grub2 directory has lots more > >> > files than the machines that are running the 64bit versions, and > >> > they were clean installs while these were older machines that > >> > were upgraded to f20 from older versions, and it appears they may > >> > not had the space after the mbr. > >> > > >> > The grub2 is reported as 2.00-26 > >> > >> Where are you seeing the version reported? At boot at the top of > >> the grub menu? > > > > rpm -q grub2 > > > > grub2-2.00-26-fc20.i686 > > My strong suspicion is that while you may have grub 2.00 *utilities* > installed, Fedora hasn't properly run grub-install to install grub > 2.00 as your bootloader, and thus you're left with some older version > of grub that was installed previously. Please check what version of > grub is reported at boot (if that is difficult for some reason, there > are ways to check while booted also). > > -- > Jordan Uggla (Jordan_U on irc.freenode.net) > > _______________________________________________ > Help-grub mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-grub +----------------------------------------------------------+ Michael D. Setzer II - Computer Science Instructor Guam Community College Computer Center mailto:[email protected] mailto:[email protected] http://www.guam.net/home/mikes Guam - Where America's Day Begins G4L Disk Imaging Project maintainer http://sourceforge.net/projects/g4l/ +----------------------------------------------------------+ http://setiathome.berkeley.edu (Original) Number of Seti Units Returned: 19,471 Processing time: 32 years, 290 days, 12 hours, 58 minutes (Total Hours: 287,489) BOINC@HOME CREDITS ROSETTA 19454602.784179 | SETI 32727493.239186 ABC 16613838.513356 | EINSTEIN 32251774.985230 _______________________________________________ Help-grub mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-grub
