I am forwarding this bug from the Debian Bug Tracking System. Dirk
wants to know if you recommend exceptions or not.

Thanks,
- Jordi G. H.

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Dirk Eddelbuettel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 14-Nov-2006 11:36
Subject: Re: Bug#398628: GSL has no exception handling
To: Jordi Gutierrez Hermoso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]



On 14 November 2006 at 10:55, Jordi Gutierrez Hermoso wrote:
| Package: libgsl0
| version 1.8-1
| severity: wishlist
|
| I'm not sure if this is desirable, but in order to use exceptions in
| GSL from my C++ wrappers, GSL needs to be recompiled with the CFLAG
| -fexceptions.
|
| I did this myself with the upstream tarball and have met no
| undesirable side effects.

Very interesting suggestion. I am principally in favour, and have only two
concerns

i)   possible overhead, though the gcc manual seems to imply that it is
    affecting size only, not speed

ii)  Policy -- I am not sure if Debian has a view on this either way. I may
    bring this up on the Debian-science list.

Would you mind also asking on the GSL list if there is a general
recommendation in favour, against, or neutral?

Cheers, Dirk

--
Hell, there are no rules here - we're trying to accomplish something.
                                                 -- Thomas A. Edison


_______________________________________________
Help-gsl mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-gsl

Reply via email to