Am Mittwoch, den 07.01.2009, 00:35 -0500 schrieb Sheng Yu: > Thanks for replying! > > Yes, the results are the same. I also tried TNT and JAMA, which claim > to supersed Lapack++. But the running time was even > longer than GSL. Any other suggestions? Thanks!
Matlab uses an optimized library for the actual crunshing. On what
system are you developing?
Thomas
_______________________________________________
Help-gsl mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-gsl
