At Wed, 21 Jan 2009 22:35:21 +0100, Paul Zimmermann wrote: > of course, here is a simple wrapper for the exp function (for example):
Having given it some consideration, I think that having high-accuracy versions of a limited number of functions would be outside the scope of GSL--anyone requiring high-accuracy would probably do better to work with MPFR directly where they can get guaranteed behavior for all functions. Thanks for the suggestion though. -- Brian Gough _______________________________________________ Help-gsl mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-gsl
