Hello, Attached I send a file containing the first version of the macros that performs the checks for the input arguments in level 2 CBLAS functions. I suppose that it would be reasonable to split the file in small files with the suitable macro for each group of functions (s, d, c and/or z prefixes). What do you think about?
Sounds reasonable, you could make it more compact by defining macros > for each case (stride, dimensions, etc) since they are common to all > functions and combining them in a macro for each function type. I don't know if we do this without extra confusion. The problem is that the arguments stride, dimensions, etc. can be in different positions of the argument list in the different functions, and pass this information to the macros would be confused. -- ***************************************** José Luis García Pallero [email protected] (o< / / \ V_/_ Use Debian GNU/Linux and enjoy! *****************************************
error_cblas.h
Description: Binary data
_______________________________________________ Help-gsl mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-gsl
