On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 12:21 PM, Daniel Neilson <ddneil...@gmail.com>wrote:
> > That's the point of the "params" parameter to your eoms function. You can > pass in a pointer to your Torus class, then just typecast the void* to a > Torus* as the first statement in eoms(). > > Unfortunately, there's not going to be a way for you to treat eoms as a > member function of Torus -- and gain easy access to the member variables. > > -Daniel > So it seems the moral of the story is that GSL was written with C in mind, not C++. Passing pointers to the time, state, ode right hand sides, and parameters at each time step wouldn't be needed if each of these things were member attributes that the ode function had access to. So trying to fit the existing framework into a C++ object may not make the most sense, it seems to me. I'll probably just go with a functional approach for now. Thanks for all the help. ~Luke _______________________________________________ Help-gsl mailing list Help-gsl@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-gsl
