At Thu, 16 Jun 2011 09:47:35 -0500, Waclaw Kusnierczyk wrote: > I can of course implement this for my project, but a more portable > solution is preferable. Or, perhaps, I have overlooked in the docs a > functionality like this already implemented?
Hi. You haven't overlooked anything. I agree it's more elegant to have a generic function. I didn't add a feature for it as there's a limit to how much of an object system I wanted to do in plain C (due to the risks of void *). If you need it, I'd recommend just to add a function for it in your application. _______________________________________________ Help-gsl mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-gsl
