At Mon, 04 Jul 2011 10:29:26 +0200, Marco Maggi wrote: > In general, is it maybe time to consider to rely on LAPACK > now that they have made these changes to the C API? I still > have to try the latest LAPACK, but from the README of > "lapacke.tgz": > > This implementation introduces: > > - row-major and column-major matrix layout controlled by > the first function parameter; >
Thanks for that, I hadn't seen the release announcement for the latest lapack. It's a significant development and it should definitely be possible to integrate GSL better with lapack now. _______________________________________________ Help-gsl mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-gsl
