On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 9:46 PM, carl hansen <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 7:44 PM, Leo Famulari <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 05:24:36PM -0800, carl hansen wrote: >> > resent >> > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >> > From: carl hansen <[email protected]> >> > Date: Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 5:21 PM >> > Subject: warning: collision encountered >> > To: [email protected] >> > >> > >> > I get >> > warning: collision encountered: ... >> > warning: arbitrarily choosing /gnu/store/89 >> > messages, >> > What do they mean? and How to fix? >> >> Does this explanation make sense? >> http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=22402#37 >> >> If so, then you should read the warnings and investigate which files are >> colliding. Some, like the hicolor icon-theme.cache, seem harmless to me, >> although I welcome a second opinion. >> >> [...] >> >> > 13985 warning: collision encountered: >> > /gnu/store/wfvxxpdhnzd59vkad1zasm4f858giv9a-gcj-4.9.3/lib/libatomic.la >> > /gnu/store /rsgg9a3kwivqszsydvan8pbpdq9ivar5-gccgo-4.8.5/lib/ >> > libatomic.la /gnu/store/0bz73dnv3yyiff0fgph9c8lvjz919cl1-gcc-bo >> > otstrap-0/lib/libatomic.la >> > 13986 warning: arbitrarily choosing >> > /gnu/store/wfvxxpdhnzd59vkad1zasm4f858giv9a-gcj-4.9.3/lib/libatomic.la >> > 13987 2354 packages in profile >> >> I don't know about this one. Files the .la extension are used by libtool >> but I don't have enough experience with libtool or know enough about >> libatomic to know if this is going to be a problem. >> > > Yes this is a continuation of my previous question. Thanks for response. I > didn't > show the complete output. But I tried to show there are 13987 LINES in the > error > messages. It's not so much the particular cases, it's Why is this > happening at all? > Did I do smething wrong or is this software error? ANd, what is the proper > procedure to > removal of one of the options? > Is it something like: <http://libatomic.la> > guix package -r /gnu/store/wfvxxpdhnzd59vkad1zasm4f858giv9a-gcj-4.9.3/lib/ > libatomic.la > or is it > guix package -r /gnu/store/wfvxxpdhnzd59vkad1zasm4f858giv9a-gcj-4.9.3 > or is it > guix package -r / gcj > And can it be done globally? > THere must be something I'm not doing correctly. > > followup I do: # ls -1 /gnu/store |sort -k 1.34 >/tmp/a in /tmp/a I see many , what look like duplicates, module the base32 string in the front, for example 38 63zwd686rpjifkv37abmd723asjzskva-acl-2.2.52/ 39 csrip06lky3f2abgyvzc2bki9pgnz4ib-acl-2.2.52/ 40 rjcxalra8f54qk7h32zw8irx4fi9x649-acl-2.2.52/ 41 y1kvygp3yaj1p0ar134rxl8y6dn3vc93-acl-2.2.52/ 42 72ax524fif2yii3bqwa3rjnh450cj3vc-acl-2.2.52.drv 43 bzhcnfwikxh9rm52cq8cphzk77k9sfxv-acl-2.2.52.drv 44 fihsyanl3a8bwpxlyx25dgi0z1zmqcp4-acl-2.2.52.drv 45 kvrwv1bndn4935k21qimvanqc9dwlljj-acl-2.2.52.drv 46 sy6b7h80z1vm9dc0xixbli9n9500q5c6-acl-2.2.52.drv 47 x03zv2wxk9xvw27pg5vvy6lbfavy3nix-acl-2.2.52.drv 48 y8ql9x2sck3jr26jf5l9ky9lz7ci0aaq-acl-2.2.52.drv 49 1jwh0x0mvvjmq9gjn9lxnw6szvpb5bwi-acl-2.2.52-guile-builder 50 daridrmp97fnim0pddp51lhqn1c1nwv0-acl-2.2.52-guile-builder 51 hbi7spdvfs177c3jzv3zn85j5wgp7hrv-acl-2.2.52-guile-builder 52 lj4bmca87irvdsvrngsgah96yby3rzpx-acl-2.2.52-guile-builder 53 w51ji955hc155h5lcmvcmpq33fr407vq-acl-2.2.52-guile-builder 54 xzzl47vl72630q2idvcy24jm4ln47xkh-acl-2.2.52-guile-builder 55 2x3b0w1cx9128p564s5iryp76yy4l8w0-acl-2.2.52.src.tar.gz 56 40652r2q5pp3dsagmgvrsdxqvwhlsgh0-acl-2.2.52.src.tar.gz.drv 57 44j13yy6i77ds4h892hpjwqw37lilzpd-acl-2.2.52.src.tar.gz.drv 58 gp8n2wncrh28z6ci2d19ygajsjr6r8j2-acl-2.2.52.src.tar.gz.drv 59 l9r8zfdrr3zj9sab718rvka1526iqqam-acl-2.2.52.src.tar.gz.drv 60 ls6l9hw5mni4gnvv3ah3rw0w8vsb9bcm-acl-2.2.52.src.tar.gz.drv 61 pdfkasamwqgfb3a3q4fl76n3063bg4xl-acl-2.2.52.src.tar.gz.drv 62 rpsy437kb159jah8jc28maqdlc0bl6dg-acl-2.2.52.src.tar.gz.drv 63 wy8x3rv7813y0m066j8hgdjnglhhgndz-acl-2.2.52.src.tar.xz 64 2ni0661zabg5smck6waw7klhgn2ap148-acl-2.2.52.src.tar.xz-builder 65 afpdjihigsq17jmfbpl1bp0dmjmzxxs3-acl-2.2.52.src.tar.xz-builder 66 g138q6khixv4bncbarq5iqkmwgmz2kzm-acl-2.2.52.src.tar.xz-builder 67 qw0d8nijs4a6ws3lnsp05jj8r0l8jj7x-acl-2.2.52.src.tar.xz-builder 68 s87d78mkxcifsmzyazrjsgk08madmxmg-acl-2.2.52.src.tar.xz-builder 69 ygb39n10b8igrna3cpb3jq4c6pfvgxr4-acl-2.2.52.src.tar.xz-builder 70 9xpib4851r6fzcbpqkx2kzkpss41n396-acl-2.2.52.src.tar.xz.drv 71 fzfz725bc0w09ywkzy2pmgds3gddq2qh-acl-2.2.52.src.tar.xz.drv 72 ldqb22pvg98qviicnv6j1ngl5d0xp990-acl-2.2.52.src.tar.xz.drv 73 myw3bnfnr8yincq0fpqjaa3pqmn765bx-acl-2.2.52.src.tar.xz.drv 74 qnq01qbjdjvxp72iw9hjv1wch5i06rni-acl-2.2.52.src.tar.xz.drv 75 x79i0cjjzn2pjrnfs1v12cal4habdbdx-acl-2.2.52.src.tar.xz.drv 76 xz4pv2gwg56xnb97bv8scwcqi36l3by2-acl-2.2.52.src.tar.xz.drv 77 x90p71bkxmlr66fwhrp2vzlhc2p4adjl-acl-hurd-path-max.patch Shirlie, that can't be right? BTW ls -1 /gnu/store|wc 14580 14580 849158 does that seem reasonable?
