Leo Famulari <l...@famulari.name> skribis: > On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 11:06:49PM +0200, Efraim Flashner wrote: >> On Thu, 10 Mar 2016 15:45:51 -0500
[...] >> > I agree that we should build our Mutt with this option enabled. >> > >> > If everyone agrees, the question is which database to use — we have gdbm >> > and bdb in our package tree (I think tokyocabinet is a WIP). I have no >> > idea which database is a better choice. What do people think? >> >> Assuming mutt, gdbm and bdb build on all architectures, comparing guix graph >> of mutt, gdbm and bdb, and the graph of the two databases is identical. The >> only other input I have is that debian uses tokyocabinet as a dependancy. > > It looks like they both build on all architectures. > > Gdbm is a little smaller and it's a GNU project, so I vote for gdbm, in > the absence of any knowledge of the two databases' technical merits. +1. (I wonder how this relates to the subject of this message, though. ;-)) Ludo’.
