Hi Gregor, Gregor Giesen <[email protected]> skribis:
> On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 09:58:55AM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote: >> In cases like the one you describe, we usually end up modifying tests to >> use the numerical values for services and protocols rather than their >> names. > Unfortunately, this turns out to be quite cumbersome since in my case > (unittests for unbound) there is a lot of test data to be modified and > in many cases not only plain text but also encrypted records (DNSSEC > tests). On the other hand the values to be looked up are mostly “udp” > and “tcp” in /etc/protocols and “domain” in /etc/services, so I decided > that using a preload library for these few glibc calls just in case of > the unittest should do the trick rather than no checks at all. I think it would be easier to just use ‘substitute*’ to replace all the occurrences of “tcp”, etc., wouldn’t it? > However, it is an ugly hack and bloats the package definition. I agree, but it’s hard to improve on it without compromising reproducibility. Thanks, Ludo’.
