Oleg Pykhalov <[email protected]> writes: > Pierre Neidhardt <[email protected]> writes: > > What do you think about ‘inxi’ package with inputs, which are only > required to run it, > and another ‘inxi-full’ package, which will inherit ‘inxi’, but with > additional inputs?
My first thought is that it sounds like a good alternative to the
concept of optional dependencies.
I like the idea.
It also means that the `inxi` package cannot patch inxi with full store
paths.
Any suggestion other than making leaving ENV{'PATH'} untouched and
setting @paths to it?
--
Pierre Neidhardt
There is more to life than increasing its speed.
-- Mahatma Gandhi
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
