Pierre Neidhardt <[email protected]> writes: > You could also try playing with the > `--dynamic-space-size` command line flag, e.g. > > sbcl --dynamic-space-size 2048 ...
That was a good idea. It turns out that 1024 is just a bit too low to do program-op, though load-system works. With 1280 I can do program-op on numcl. So it looks like SBCL 2.0.2 just needs a bit of extra memory compared to older versions. Guillaume's suggestion of increasing the limit should thus be sufficient. Cheers, Konrad.
