On Fri, 29 Apr 2022, Ricardo Wurmus <[email protected]> wrote: > Exactly the same way. The first argument to WITH-CHANNELS would be > (cons C G) and thus P and D would be picked from the set of C and G. C > and G can be specified with exact commits or branches, just like the > --channels option to “guix time-machine”. > > We already have all the tools for WITH-CHANNELS — that’s (guix > inferior). We just don’t have a convenient syntax to do this without a > lot of boilerplate.
Right. It would be great I think. However, time-machine does the job for now, at least for my case. But it would definitely allow for better channel granularity. To continue! -- Olivier Dion oldiob.dev
