Heya,
On Thu Oct 13, 2022 at 8:17 AM BST, Wojtek Kosior via wrote:
> > guix environment -L . -e '(@ (hydrilla) hydrilla)' -- python3 -m build -s
> > guix pack -L . -RR \
> > -S /hydrilla=bin/hydrilla \
> > -S /hydrilla-builder=bin/hydrilla-builder \
> > -S /hydrilla-server=bin/hydrilla-server \
> > -S /haketilo=bin/haketilo \
> > -e '(@ (hydrilla) hydrilla-dist-tarball)'
I don't think this is an optimal way to use ``guix pack''. Surely this pack
won't contain the Python modules that the script needs to import...?
Have you tried
guix pack -RL. hydrilla
? Note that you don't actually need to use ``-e'', as the UI finds packages
by scanning all the modules in the load path for public variables containing
<package> objects.
Also, ``guix environment'' has been deprecated for a while now; consider using
``guix shell'':
guix environment -L. hydrilla
# becomes
guix shell -DL. hydrilla
(``-D'' means "use the dependencies of the next listed package", as ``--ad-hoc''
is the default behaviour of ``guix shell''.)
-- (
