On Tue, 22 Nov 2022 12:06:43 -0800 Felix Lechner <[email protected]> 
wrote:
> Here, I would have used "consuming packages" instead of dependents,
> because the former is so clearly distinct from the ubiquitous but
> ambiguous word "dependencies".

How about "dag kiddies"?

> Happy hacking, and thank you all for your contributions to Guix!

Thank you too!

Reply via email to