Hi Dave, On Fri, 12 May 2023 at 12:14, "Thompson, David" <[email protected]> wrote:
> It *sounds* like it should be the case, but it isn't. Specifying the > command to run explicitly is considered a non-interactive case, and in > non-interactive mode the automagic guix.scm/manifest.scm reading does > not occur. :( Oh, I see. Thanks for the reminder <https://issues.guix.gnu.org/57467>. Hum, as you note in [1], maybe there are 2 tools with contradictory needs. Well, I think that GUIX_EXTENSIONS_PATHS is not enough used as a mean for testing new CLI. I mean, we could imagine an extension that would be installable as a regular package and then it would provide the CLI you would like. Well, I do not know if it is a good idea to overwrite built-in commands but extensions would allow to test various CLI, IMHO. 1: https://yhetil.org/guix/CAJ=RwfaYrJqcREgbww_XmfBzsfTjF+9tiLm2Zb0N9Dq8puS=s...@mail.gmail.com Cheers, simon
