Hello,
De Remco van 't Veer le 22/12/2023 à 08:56:
> This works for me but I am not sure it's still needed. I am pretty sure
> swaylock does not like to be setuid anymore.
I faced the same issue some time ago, not sure when. Indeed the issue was with
swaylock complaining about setuid. My system configuration contains the
following simpler entry, which uses screen-locker-configuration:
(operating-system
...
(services
(cons*
...
(service screen-locker-service-type
(screen-locker-configuration
(name "swaylock")
(program (file-append swaylock "/bin/swaylock"))
(using-pam? #t)
(using-setuid? #f)))
...
%desktop-services))
...
)
--
Emmanuel
