> I think what happens is this: > > 1. ‘guix home container’ doesn’t provide /etc/profile, which could be > reported as a bug. > > 2. .zprofile (provided by Guix Home) requires /etc/profile to exist, > and thus fails if it doesn’t, whereas .bashrc (provided by Guix > Home) gracefully handles lack of /etc/profile. A second bug. > > Does that make sense?
If I'm understanding this correctly the former is 'guix home container' not providing a fundamental file to make the environment work, while the latter is bash ignoring this fundamental file, or at least being able to handle the fact its missing (this seems more of an accidental feature than a bug :)). I checked on the guix bug tracker and it seems that this two bugs haven't been reported yet. Now I'm going to update and to create a minimal reproducible example and try to report the two. Thanks for the help Mario
