Hello Hugo and others; yours is a good list of when to use an LLM,
except I take issue with one part; overall someone™ should eventually
find free language data and put together a plain LLM data Guix package
as a component for guix refresh.

Hugo Buddelmeijer via <[email protected]> writes:

> This small list is just scratching the surface, but these are things
> I'd like to do already now:
>
> - Agents help with learning and gaining understanding, for example an
>   unknown code base.
>
> - Agents often (not always) produce much better code.  Especially for
>   simple things, so we as humans can focus on the more complex /
>   higher level things.
>
> - Agents can check human written code.  They can catch many minor
>   problems, so the humans can focus on the big problems (assuming the
>   LLM doesn't catch those also).

I do not believe that the LLM check code well.  Static analysis tools do
this, cheaply and low-cost; some are free and in Guix.  The LLM just
articulates what static analysis has found, and proposes fixes.


> - Agents are so much faster for simple things, like writing patches
>   for broken packages.  This frees up human time for more complex
>  things.

Regards,
Florian

  • Re: AI Hugo Buddelmeijer via
  • Re: AI Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide
  • Re: AI Hugo Buddelmeijer via
  • Re: AI Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide
  • Re: AI Hugo Buddelmeijer via
  • Re: AI Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide
  • Re: AI Ludovic Courtès
  • Re: AI Igorj Gorjaĉev via
  • Re: AI Ludovic Courtès
  • Re: AI Hugo Buddelmeijer via
  • Re: AI pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)
  • Re: AI Ian Eure
  • Re: AI Hugo Buddelmeijer via

Reply via email to