Re: Adding "sub-users" to Hurd?

[Kalle Olavi Niemitalo]

Adam Olsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> "Niels M�ller" wrote:
> > Then I start the untrusted script in such away that it has no
> > privileges at all with the standard authserver (i.e. like the system's
> > no-uid" user).
[...]
> The real question here is if it's possible to prevent them from using
> the normal hurd auth server.

If the processes don't have any IDs in the system auth server,
they can't use it for anything even if they find a way to access
it.