Just one little addition:
> Of course, some pages are not relevant to the actual version of GNUmach
> (e.g. norma_*()), but I'd strongly advocate to keep those pages around
> anyway, just in case someone wants to extend GNUmach with NORMA and/or
> understand other Mach-related code.
The man pages from CMU don't contain norma_*() pages ("just" the NORMA
code itself). I guess, reading so much sources did let me believe the
man pages were there too (and not only in the OSF/1 docs) ;-) Anyway,
we don't have NORMA in gnumach (yet?) and most of us won't therefore miss
the related man pages so much.
-Farid.
--
Farid Hajji -- Unix Systems and Network Administrator | Phone: +49-2131-67-555
Broicherdorfstr. 83, D-41564 Kaarst, Germany | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - + - - - - - - - - - - - -
Fermat: ...I've found a remarkable proof for this: Let x,y @#$!@$!2@ NO CARRIER
