On Wed, 23 Aug 2000, OKUJI Yoshinori wrote: > You just misunderstand something: Not everyone tells you to work on > OSKit. Actually, I myself don't recommend using OSKit. Ah, finally, someone who wants us to deal with gnumach! :-) It's just that I'd heard from more than four people that we should probably work on OSKit rather than gnumach, so I was getting curious. > I don't know. Perhaps there was a historical reason. I can probably supply a patch if needed. It really should be made more generic on a non-arch-dependent level (leave the typedef'ing of fixed-size types to arch-dependent headers). C
- Re: Linux drivers in gnumach OKUJI Yoshinori
- Re: Linux drivers in gnumach Per Lundberg
- Re: Linux drivers in gnumach Marcus Brinkmann
- Re: Linux drivers in gnumach Christopher C. Chimelis
- Re: Linux drivers in gnumach Marcus Brinkmann
- Re: Linux drivers in gnumach Christopher C. Chimelis
- Re: Linux drivers in gnumach OKUJI Yoshinori
- Re: Linux drivers in gnumach Jeff Bailey
- Re: Linux drivers in gnumach Christopher C. Chimelis
- Re: Linux drivers in gnumach Jeff Bailey
- Re: Linux drivers in gnumach Christopher C. Chimelis
- Re: Linux drivers in gnumach Roland McGrath
- Re: Linux drivers in gnumach Daniel Wagner
- Re: Linux drivers in gnumach Christopher C. Chimelis
- Re: Linux drivers in gnumach Daniel Wagner
