> 1. No one really wants to work on gnumach.
> 2. OSkit-mach is too slow. The COM interface in oskit is (IMO) too
> bloated (this is in regards to many people saying "use oskit-mach").
Do you mean relative to gnumach or just in general?
Noone has reported anything about performance of oskit-mach to me.
Not that I am against using L4 or other kernels, but there is a lot of work
involved in that.
_______________________________________________
Help-hurd mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-hurd
