Svanberg Liss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Aah! You want transparent per-function threading at the binary
> level! Actually, I'm quite interested in such ideas.
It sounds like you want a dataflow language. Take a look at the Oz
language: <http://www.mozart-oz.org/>. It requires you to say when
separate threads should be started, but apart from that the flow of
data is handled transparently -- threads will suspend until a value
they need becomes available.
--
Mark Seaborn
- [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://members.xoom.com/mseaborn/ -
``Water boils at a lower temperature at high altitude, which partly
accounts for the nasty taste of coffee on the summit of Mauna Kea''
_______________________________________________
Help-hurd mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-hurd
