Jamie Gennis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Wed, 2002-02-13 at 11:20, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote: > > Well, the reason against this is that translators are really just > > mount points, and existing ls does *not* treat them differently. > > That's true for some translators, but others are used more like devices, > which does show up in ls output.
No, you're missing the point. The underlying node is *not* displayed even there. You should *still* walk the translator, because it's the *translator* that knows "I'm a device" and will report the right stat information for the device. Thomas _______________________________________________ Help-hurd mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-hurd
