[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Niels M�ller) writes:
> Well, because it's a friendly thing to do?
Well, I don't think that is a good argument. Then you could also ask
why we care about (local) privacy at all.
> (When I open my door for a visitor, I don't usually lock the doors
> to rooms that the visitor isn't supposed to see, and sometimes I
> even encourage them to look around).
Yes, true. But the point is that you don't know wether it's a nice
visitor or an intruder. I also don't understand the purpose, because
a user would surely login if he would have real work to do at the
sytem.
> And because the typical local user nowadays has physical access to
> the machine, so it's usually futile to stop attacks from evil local
> users.
True, if a user has physical access, he would be able to spy out data
anyway. But I think, we shouldn't have our door that open however.
> If you're saying that this should be easy to configure based on
> local policy, I'm all for it.
Yes..
moritz
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://duesseldorf.ccc.de/~moritz/
GPG fingerprint = 3A14 3923 15BE FD57 FC06 B501 0841 2D7B 6F98 4199
_______________________________________________
Help-hurd mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-hurd
