"Thomas Bushnell, BSG" wrote: > > Guy Bormann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Why is this called /servers anyway? Is it (Mach) legacy? Since it's > > for rendez-vous points, why not call it /rendez-vous, /contacts, > > /endpoints, /serv[ices] or something along this line? (I see the > > link with the exec or password server, but this is not valid for > > pflocal/pfinet vs /servers/socket/[12] ...) > > They are all plain servers; that is, they are not really implementing > filesystem abstractions. Please ask these questions on the mailing > list; other people may be asking the same thing. Sorry, of course...I just forgot to Reply to All, instead of simple Reply.
Thanks, Guy Bormann ----------------------------------------+-------------------------------------------- Dr. Guy Bormann | email : Guy dot Bormann at ua dot ac dot be Theoretical Physics of Condensed Matter o smail : Building N Dept. Natuurkunde | Universiteitsplein 1 Universiteit Antwerpen | 2610 Wilrijk Belgium _______________________________________________ Help-hurd mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-hurd
